Consistency and impact of mixed receiver antenna phase centre models in regional GNSS networks

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/4852
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/4895
dc.contributor.author Kersten, Tobias ger
dc.contributor.author Kröger, Johannes ger
dc.contributor.author Breva, Yannick ger
dc.contributor.author Schön, Steffen ger
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-22T05:51:35Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-22T05:51:35Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Kersten, T.; Kröger, J.; Breva, Y.; Schön, S.: Consistency and impact of mixed receiver antenna phase centre models in regional GNSS networks. Presentation at Euref Symposium 2019, May 22-24, Tallinn, Estonia. ger
dc.description.abstract The Institut für Erdmessung (IfE) at the Leibniz University Hannover calibrates GNSS antennas determined by the well known robot based concept in the field. Our group has recently improved the calibration procedure to support absolute receiver antenna calibrations for all GNSS frequencies (GPS L1/L2/L5, GLONASS L1/L2 and Galileo E1/E5). To fully use the advantage of multi GNSS processing capabilities for absolute and relative precise positioning, accurate and consistent receiver antenna calibration patterns of ground stations are required. Currently, in IGS and EPN they are available by chamber calibration method for some antennas. However, systematic and sometimes significant differences exist between both approaches (field robot and chamber) that have to be studied in detail to identify the causes and to fix these issues. In this contribution, we present first robot based multi GNSS patterns from IfE. Furthermore, a study is performed, to show the impact from the observation domain (differences of antenna phase centre patterns) to the parameter domain (position, troposphere, ambiguities). In this study, we used reference stations from the EPN network which provide individual antenna patterns obtained from both approaches (field robot and chamber). Baselines of lengths ranging from 150-600km and one of 1670km are analysed. We found that on the one hand, differences between both pattern sets do not met the proposed "1mm-rule-of-thumb" in the most of studied cases. On the other hand, we show that in cases of consistent antenna pattern sets no significant differences in the parameter domain are obtained. However, mixing patterns from different approaches implies deviations of up to 1cm (in one case up to 2cm) mostly in the topocentric up component. These differences are directly aligned to the differences in the antenna pattern. ger
dc.language.iso eng ger
dc.publisher Hannover : Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universität Hannover
dc.relation.requires https://doi.org/10.25835/0075279
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 DE ger
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de/ ger
dc.subject GPS/GNSS antennas eng
dc.subject regional GNSS networks eng
dc.subject antenna calibration eng
dc.subject carrier phase centre variations eng
dc.subject GPS/GNSS Antennen ger
dc.subject regionale GNSS Netze ger
dc.subject Antennenkalibrierung ger
dc.subject Trägerphasenvariationen ger
dc.subject.ddc 520 | Astronomie, Kartographie ger
dc.subject.ddc 621,3 | Elektrotechnik, Elektronik ger
dc.title Consistency and impact of mixed receiver antenna phase centre models in regional GNSS networks eng
dc.type ConferenceObject ger
dc.type Text ger
dc.description.version publishedVersion ger
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich ger


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics