Anaerobic Digestion of Hemp and Flax Straw and Shives and Rapeseed Straw by the Ruminal Microbiota

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16272
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/16399
dc.contributor.author Figueiredo, Aline Fernandes
dc.contributor.author Brede, Melanie
dc.contributor.author Heller, Jannika
dc.contributor.author Redzepovic, Larissa
dc.contributor.author Illi, Lukas
dc.contributor.author Weichgrebe, Dirk
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-12T08:15:42Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-12T08:15:42Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Figueiredo, A.F.; Brede, M.; Heller, J.; Redzepovic, L.; Illi, L. et al.: Anaerobic Digestion of Hemp and Flax Straw and Shives and Rapeseed Straw by the Ruminal Microbiota. In: BioEnergy Research 17 (2024), S. 700–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-023-10667-7
dc.description.abstract To mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy supply security, there is an increasing effort toward the use of non-fossil energy sources. Crop residues have a great potential to be exploited as biomass for biogas production. However, due to their lignocellulosic structures they are difficult to degrade and do not reach competitive performance. A feasible option to mine these substrates is present in the forestomach of ruminants. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to use rumen microorganisms to improve anaerobic digestion (AD) of crop residues. For this purpose, hemp straw, mechanically pre-treated hemp fibers and shives, flax straw, flax shives, and aged and fresh rapeseed straw were evaluated using the rumen simulation technique. The AD of the substrates was divided into three batches. In two batches, hay was added as a control substrate. In summary, none of the analyzed substrates had an equivalent performance as the control hay, but pre-treated hemp fibers and shives had better AD parameters compared to all other alternative substrates, with the lowest pH (mean: 6.81), highest short chain fatty acid (20.0 mmol/day) and H2 production (25.6 mM) and highest degradability (25.2%). Flax straw had the second-best performance (6.81, 17.4 mmol/day, 20.6 mM and 22.2%, respectively), followed by fresh rapeseed straw, hemp straw, aged rapeseed straw and flax shives. Therefore, hemp fibers and shives demonstrated to be the most suitable substrates for AD. However, since pre-treatment can represent significant additional costs for biogas production, flax straw also demonstrated to be a good alternative. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher New York, NY : Springer
dc.relation.ispartofseries BioEnergy Research 17 (2024)
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject Anaerobic digestion eng
dc.subject Biogas eng
dc.subject Crop residues eng
dc.subject Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC) eng
dc.subject Straw eng
dc.subject.ddc 620 | Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau
dc.title Anaerobic Digestion of Hemp and Flax Straw and Shives and Rapeseed Straw by the Ruminal Microbiota eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1939-1242
dc.relation.issn 1939-1234
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-023-10667-7
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 17
dc.bibliographicCitation.date 2024
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 700
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 709
dc.description.version publishedVersion eng
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken