Compensation of adverse growing media effects on plant growth and morphology by supplemental LED lighting

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16199
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/16326
dc.contributor.author Solbach, Jan Andreas
dc.contributor.author Fricke, Andreas
dc.contributor.author Stützel, Hartmut
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-08T13:06:23Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-08T13:06:23Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Solbach, J.A.; Fricke, A.; Stützel, H.: Compensation of adverse growing media effects on plant growth and morphology by supplemental LED lighting. In: PLOS ONE 18 (2023), Nr. 9, e0291601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291601
dc.description.abstract There is an increasing interest in alternatives to peat in growing media due to environmental constraints. However, plants grown in peat substitutes often show impaired growth compared to plants grown in peat-based media. Hence, it would be interesting to know whether these deficiencies can be compensated by supplementing other growth factors, e.g. light. The present study aims to investigate the interactive nature between growing media and supplemental lighting on plant growth and morphology, and to examine whether supplemental light emitting diode (LED) lighting may compensate adverse growing media effects. Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) were grown in different growing media consisting of peat, green compost, coconut pulp, wood fibre, perlite and sphagnum moss under blue, red and far-red supplemental LED lighting. We found significant interactions between growing media and supplemental photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) on plant growth, morphology and development. At low light intensities, peat-based and substituted growing media performed similarly, whereas with increasing light intensities the peat-based growing media significantly outperformed their alternatives. The substrate choice determines the required amount of supplemental light to compensate for adverse growing media effects and the amount varies depending on plant species and season. Thereby, it was indicated that red light alleviates adverse growing media effects best. We also found that far-red light is not effective when background PAR is low and becomes more effective under high background PAR. The implications and prospects of the results are discussed. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher San Francisco, California, US : PLOS
dc.relation.ispartofseries PLOS ONE 18 (2023), Nr. 9
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions eng
dc.subject Light eng
dc.subject Lighting eng
dc.subject Ocimum basilicum eng
dc.subject Plant Development eng
dc.subject Soil eng
dc.subject.ddc 500 | Naturwissenschaften
dc.subject.ddc 610 | Medizin, Gesundheit
dc.title Compensation of adverse growing media effects on plant growth and morphology by supplemental LED lighting eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1932-6203
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291601
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 9
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 18
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage e0291601
dc.description.version publishedVersion eng
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich
dc.bibliographicCitation.articleNumber e0291601


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics