Re-evaluation of Cerebropollenites thiergartii Eberh.Schulz 1967 and related taxa: priority of Sciadopityspollenites and nomenclatural novelties

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16175
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/16302
dc.contributor.author Gravendyck, Julia
dc.contributor.author Coiffard, Clément
dc.contributor.author B. Bachelier, Julien
dc.contributor.author Kürschner, Wolfram
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-08T08:59:01Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-08T08:59:01Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Gravendyck, J.; Coiffard, C.; B. Bachelier, J.; Kürschner, W.: Re-evaluation of Cerebropollenites thiergartii Eberh.Schulz 1967 and related taxa: priority of Sciadopityspollenites and nomenclatural novelties. In: Grana 62 (2023), Nr. 1, S. 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2022.2158688
dc.description.abstract The important marker species for the base of the Jurassic, Cerebropollenites thiergartii, occurs contemporaneously with at least nine related taxa. However, their distinction is difficult and has been confused in the past. In addition, a long history of numerous recombinations with different genus names (e.g. Tsugaepollenites and Sciadopityspollenites), and inconsistent classifications or synonymisations, further complicate the taxonomic framework of Cerebropollenites thiergartii. A comprehensive study of these ten taxa, summarising their crucial distinctive characteristics and potential synonymy, is currently missing. This limits the stratigraphic value of Cerebropollenites thiergartii and associated taxa relevant to the Triassic–Jurassic transition. Here, we revisit relevant holotype material, related taxa and investigated new material for potential interspecific and intraspecific morphological variation. Based on an empirical analysis of name use and an extensive literature review, we identified previous sources of confusion, re-evaluated the distinctive characteristics and stratigraphic value of these taxa, and their relevance for the Triassic–Jurassic transition. Finally, we argue that the recombination as Sciadopityspollenites thiergartii is taxonomically and nomenclaturally imperative, not only due to priority, but also because it unifies previous disjunct use of Cerebropollenites for Mesozoic and Sciadopityspollenites for Cenozoic taxa, or Mesozoic species in many Russian studies. Thus, we propose a series of nomenclatural novelties: Sciadopityspollenites emend., Sciadopityspollenites thiergartii comb. nov. et emend., S. thiergartii ssp. nov. thiergartii, S. thiergartii ssp. multiverrucosus stat. nov., S. megaorbicularius sp. nov., S. carlylensis comb. nov. et emend., S. serratus emend., S. macroverrucosus emend., S. mesozoicus emend., Cryptopalynites gen. nov., Cryptopalynites pseudomassulae comb. nov. et emend. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofseries Grana 62 (2023), Nr. 1
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subject macroverrucosus eng
dc.subject marker fossil eng
dc.subject mesozoicus eng
dc.subject revision eng
dc.subject taxonomy eng
dc.subject Triassic–Jurassic eng
dc.subject Tsugaepollenites eng
dc.subject.ddc 580 | Pflanzen (Botanik)
dc.title Re-evaluation of Cerebropollenites thiergartii Eberh.Schulz 1967 and related taxa: priority of Sciadopityspollenites and nomenclatural novelties eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1651-2049
dc.relation.issn 0017-3134
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2022.2158688
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 1
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 62
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 1
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 47
dc.description.version publishedVersion eng
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics