Timing-specific effects of single-session M1 anodal tDCS on motor sequence retention in healthy older adults

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/15722
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/15846
dc.contributor.author Puri, Rohan
dc.contributor.author Hinder, Mark R.
dc.contributor.author Krüger, Melanie
dc.contributor.author Summers, Jeffery J.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-12T08:31:45Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-12T08:31:45Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Puri, R.; Hinder, M.R.; Krüger, M.; Summers, J.J.: Timing-specific effects of single-session M1 anodal tDCS on motor sequence retention in healthy older adults. In: Neuroimage: Reports 1 (2021), Nr. 1, 100009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100009
dc.description.abstract Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may assist in counteracting age-related decline in cognitive and motor functions. The current study investigated the potential impact of anodal tDCS, and the timing of its application, in mitigating age-related deficits in motor sequence learning. Forty-eight healthy older adults received, over the primary motor cortex (M1), tDCS – anodal and sham at least 1 week apart – before, during or after an explicit sequence-learning task with electrophysiological measures of corticospinal excitability (CSE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) also obtained. Bayesian analyses revealed no generalised benefit of anodal tDCS to motor acquisition and immediate retention. Furthermore, there was not enough evidence to support timing-specific stimulation differences on performance during acquisition and immediate retention. However, performance at delayed retention – measured 24 ​h after acquisition – was worse in the anodal (13.1%) than sham (17.6%) tDCS session for the group receiving tDCS during sequence acquisition, but not before (anodal: 18.4%; sham: 16.7%) or after (anodal: 18.5%; sham: 16.3%) it. No corresponding task-specific stimulation-based changes in CSE and SICI were observed. Thus, single-session M1 anodal tDCS in healthy older adults not only proved ineffective in facilitating sequence acquisition and immediate retention but also, when administered during sequence learning, proved detrimental to delayed retention. Overall, these null and negative results may have implications for the use of tDCS in clinical and rehabilitative settings, especially in the elderly. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher [Amsterdam] : Elsevier ScienceDirect
dc.relation.ispartofseries Neuroimage: Reports 1 (2021), Nr. 1
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject Aging eng
dc.subject Bayes eng
dc.subject Motor learning eng
dc.subject Null eng
dc.subject transcranial direct current stimulation eng
dc.subject Transcranial magnetic stimulation eng
dc.subject.ddc 610 | Medizin, Gesundheit
dc.title Timing-specific effects of single-session M1 anodal tDCS on motor sequence retention in healthy older adults eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 2666-9560
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100009
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 1
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 1
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 100009
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics