Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/12934
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/13038
dc.contributor.author Nedkov, Stoyan
dc.contributor.author Campagne, Sylvie
dc.contributor.author Borisova, Bilyana
dc.contributor.author Krpec, Petr
dc.contributor.author Prodanova, Hristina
dc.contributor.author Kokkoris, Ioannis P.
dc.contributor.author Hristova, Desislava
dc.contributor.author Le Clec'h, Solen
dc.contributor.author Santos-Martin, Fernando
dc.contributor.author Burkhard, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author Bekri, Eleni S.
dc.contributor.author Stoycheva, Vanya
dc.contributor.author Bruzón, Adrián G.
dc.contributor.author Dimopoulos, Panayotis
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-04T05:38:01Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-04T05:38:01Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Nedkov, S.; Campagne, S.; Borisova, B.; Krpec, P.; Prodanova, H. et al.: Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting. In: Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice 56 (2022), 101458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101458
dc.description.abstract Natural Capital Accounting (NCA) has evolved rapidly in recent years through substantial efforts of both international organizations and the scientific community. Water regulation ecosystem services (ES) are key elements of regulating services in ecosystem accounting, with most relevant studies strongly relying on models for ES quantification up to now. In this paper, we provide a review of modeling efforts for water regulation ES based on 148 scientific papers, properly systematized, analyzed and interpreted by using a detailed and structured original template. We examined emerging trends and gaps in model applications and the readiness to integrate them into the NCA and SEEA-EA frameworks. We propose a classification scheme which organizes the 92 different models and modeling approaches identified in the review process into eight model categories so that this scheme can be efficiently used in the water ES assessment of and for further integration into the accounting framework. Among the models, the hydrologic model SWAT and the modeling tool InVEST are by far the most popular. The results of the review revealed differences between the general ES literature and the accounting-related papers. Moreover, our analysis sets the basis for useful recommendations of which model categories are the most appropriate for the water regulation ES, included in the SEEA-EA reference list. Based on the number of relevant papers, the reliability and the confidence level of the recommendations for the use of models have been incorporated in our analysis. We highlight as model category with the highest confidence the ones relative to quantification water flow and flood control service aiming at ES accounting. Models for erosion control ES can only be recommended with a lower confidence, while for water purification the results lack clear evidence for using a particular group of models. Based on the research findings we identified the main research priorities on model integration in the accounting of water regulation ES: 1) further development of guidelines for the use of models in ecosystem accounting; 2) analyses of the spatial aspects of the model towards a clear distinction between ecosystem service supply and use; and 3) development of integrated modeling approaches for water regulation ES accounting. © 2022 The Author(s) eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseries Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice 56 (2022)
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Ecosystem functions eng
dc.subject Hydrologic models eng
dc.subject InVEST eng
dc.subject Literature review eng
dc.subject Model classification eng
dc.subject SWAT eng
dc.subject.ddc 333,7 | Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt ger
dc.title Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 2212-0416
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101458
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 56
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 101458
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics