Are non-market benefits of soybean production significant? : An extended economic analysis of smallholder soybean farming in Upper West region of northern Ghana

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/10606
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/10684
dc.contributor.author Asodina, Francis Akabo
dc.contributor.author Adams, Faizal
dc.contributor.author Nimoh, Fred
dc.contributor.author Weyori, Emmanuel A.
dc.contributor.author Wongnaa, Camillus Abawiera
dc.contributor.author Bakang, John Edudes‑Andvi
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-25T06:34:02Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-25T06:34:02Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Asodina, F.A.; Adams, F.; Nimoh, F.; Weyori, E.A.; Wongnaa, C.A. et al.: Are non-market benefits of soybean production significant? : An extended economic analysis of smallholder soybean farming in Upper West region of northern Ghana. In: Agriculture and Food Security 9 (2020), Nr. 1, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00265-7
dc.description.abstract Background: Traditional cost–benefit analysis of soybean production tends to largely focus on financial benefits to farmers, and less so on non-market co-benefits in sustaining smallholder farming systems. Relying solely on the standard financial analysis undermines the actual benefit of soybean production, which often results in ineffectual policy designs. An economic analysis that incorporates key non-pecuniary co-benefits of soybean production provide vital insight that contributes to improving productivity and overall economic well-being of farmers. Cross-sectional data were collected from 271 farmers to estimate the overall economic benefit of soybean that captures both market and non-market attributes in three major producing districts (Sissala-West, Wa-East, and Dafiama-Busie-Issa (DBI)) of Ghana. Results: When non-market co-benefits were omitted, soybean production was not profitable (-Gh¢103.10/ha or -US$22.91) in DBI while Sissala-West and Wa-East had modest profit margins. However, the financial analysis changed dramatically when an average non-market value of Gh¢345.69 (US$76.82) was incorporated in the analysis. The soybean system was, therefore, financially viable for all the districts when the non-market attributes of the crop were considered. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the importance of the non-pecuniary benefits of soybean in smallholder farming systems for policy decision-making. For instance, farmers’ motivation for soybean production is closely linked to those ancillary benefits like the biological nitrogen fixed in the soil for cultivation of other crops. Similarly, crop administrators and policy makers’ support for conservation agriculture and green environment is tied to these non-market co-benefits. © 2020, The Author(s). eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher London : Biomed Central
dc.relation.ispartofseries Agriculture and Food Security 9 (2020), Nr. 1
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject economic analysis eng
dc.subject food security eng
dc.subject non-market benefits eng
dc.subject smallholder farming systems sustainability eng
dc.subject soybean eng
dc.subject.ddc 630 | Landwirtschaft, Veterinärmedizin ger
dc.title Are non-market benefits of soybean production significant? : An extended economic analysis of smallholder soybean farming in Upper West region of northern Ghana
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 2048-7010
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00265-7
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 1
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 9
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 13
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken