- Home
- →
- Weitere Einrichtungen
- →
- An-Institute
- →
- View Item
Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):
Guo, Q.; Ghadiri, R.; Weigel, T.; Aumann, A.; Gurevich, E.L.; Esen, C. et al.: Comparison of in situ and ex situ methods for synthesis of two-photon polymerization polymer nanocomposites. In: Polymers 6 (2014), Nr. 7, S. 2037-2050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6072037
Repository version
Selected time period:
Sum total of downloads: 280
| Abstract: | |
This article reports about nanocomposites, which refractive index is tuned by adding TiO2 nanoparticles. We compare in situ/ex situ preparation of nanocomposites. Preparation procedure is described, properties of nanocomposites are compared, and especially we examine the applicability of two-photon polymerization (2PP) of synthesized nanocomposites. All prepared samples exhibit suitable optical transparency at specific laser wavelengths. Three-dimensional structures were generated by means of two-photon polymerization effect induced by a femtosecond laser. | |
| License of this version: | CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 Unported |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
| Issue Date: | 2014 |
| Appears in Collections: | An-Institute |
distribution of downloads over the selected time period:
downloads by country:
| pos. | country | downloads | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | perc. | |||
| 1 |  |
Germany | 131 | 46.79% |
| 2 |  |
United States | 38 | 13.57% |
| 3 |  |
India | 25 | 8.93% |
| 4 |  |
Malaysia | 9 | 3.21% |
| 5 |  |
No geo information available | 8 | 2.86% |
| 6 |  |
China | 7 | 2.50% |
| 7 |  |
Indonesia | 6 | 2.14% |
| 8 |  |
Pakistan | 5 | 1.79% |
| 9 |  |
Hungary | 4 | 1.43% |
| 10 |  |
Australia | 4 | 1.43% |
| other countries | 43 | 15.36% | ||
Further download figures and rankings:
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.