Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: A microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Treskova, M.; Aumann, I.; Golpon, H.; Vogel-Claussen, J.; Welte, T.; Kuhlmann, A.: Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: A microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting. In: BMC Medicine 15 (2017), Nr. 1, No. 162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0924-3

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/1820

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 193




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Background: In lung cancer screening, a nodule management protocol describes nodule assessment and thresholds for nodule size and growth rate to identify patients who require immediate diagnostic evaluation or additional imaging exams. The Netherlands-Leuvens Screening Trial and the National Lung Screening Trial used different selection criteria and nodule management protocols. Several modelling studies have reported variations in screening outcomes and cost-effectiveness across selection criteria and screening intervals; however, the effect of variations in the nodule management protocol remains uncertain. This study evaluated the effects of the eligibility criteria and nodule management protocols on the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of lung screening scenarios in a population-based setting in Germany. Methods: We developed a modular microsimulation model: a biological module simulated individual histories of lung cancer development from carcinogenesis onset to death; a screening module simulated patient selection, screening-detection, nodule management protocols, diagnostic evaluation and screening outcomes. Benefits included mortality reduction, life years gained and averted lung cancer deaths. Harms were costs, false positives and overdiagnosis. The comparator was no screening. The evaluated 76 screening scenarios included variations in selection criteria and thresholds for nodule size and growth rate. Results: Five years of annual screening resulted in a 9.7-12.8% lung cancer mortality reduction in the screened population. The efficient scenarios included volumetric assessment of nodule size, a threshold for a volume of 300 mm3 and a threshold for a volume doubling time of 400 days. Assessment of volume doubling time is essential for reducing overdiagnosis and false positives. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the efficient scenarios were 16,754-23,847 euro per life year gained and 155,287-285,630 euro per averted lung cancer death. Conclusions: Lung cancer screening can be cost-effective in Germany. Along with the eligibility criteria, the nodule management protocol influences screening performance and cost-effectiveness. Definition of the thresholds for nodule size and nodule growth in the nodule management protocol should be considered in detail when defining optimal screening strategies.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2017
Appears in Collections:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 129 66.84%
2 image of flag of United States United States 23 11.92%
3 image of flag of China China 9 4.66%
4 image of flag of Bangladesh Bangladesh 9 4.66%
5 image of flag of Latvia Latvia 3 1.55%
6 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 3 1.55%
7 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 2 1.04%
8 image of flag of France France 2 1.04%
9 image of flag of Canada Canada 2 1.04%
10 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 1 0.52%
    other countries 10 5.18%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse