Crowdsourcing Scholarly Discourse Annotations

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Oelen, A.; Stocker, M.; Auer, S.: Crowdsourcing Scholarly Discourse Annotations. In: Hammond, T.; Verbert, K.; Parra, D.; Knijnenburg, B.; O'Donovan, J. et al. (eds.): IUI '21: 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York, NY : Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, S. 464-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3397481.3450685

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/16917

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 6




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
The number of scholarly publications grows steadily every year and it becomes harder to find, assess and compare scholarly knowledge effectively. Scholarly knowledge graphs have the potential to address these challenges. However, creating such graphs remains a complex task. We propose a method to crowdsource structured scholarly knowledge from paper authors with a web-based user interface supported by artificial intelligence. The interface enables authors to select key sentences for annotation. It integrates multiple machine learning algorithms to assist authors during the annotation, including class recommendation and key sentence highlighting. We envision that the interface is integrated in paper submission processes for which we define three main task requirements: The task has to be . We evaluated the interface with a user study in which participants were assigned the task to annotate one of their own articles. With the resulting data, we determined whether the participants were successfully able to perform the task. Furthermore, we evaluated the interface's usability and the participant's attitude towards the interface with a survey. The results suggest that sentence annotation is a feasible task for researchers and that they do not object to annotate their articles during the submission process.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: BookPart
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2021
Appears in Collections:Forschungszentren

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of United States United States 3 50.00%
2 image of flag of Germany Germany 3 50.00%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse