Roski, M.; Walkowiak, M.; Nehring, A.: Universal Design for Learning: The More, the Better?. In: Education Sciences 11 (2021), Nr. 4, 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040164
Abstract: | |
An experimental study investigated the effects of applying principles of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Focusing on epistemic beliefs (EBs) in inclusive science classes, we compared four groups who worked with learning environments based more or less on UDL principles and filled out an original version of a widely used EBs questionnaire or an adapted version using the Universal Design for Assessment (UDA). Based on measurement invariance analyses, a multiple indicator, and multiple cause (MIMIC) approach as well as multi-group panel models, the results do not support an outperformance of the extensive UDL environment. Moreover, the UDA-based questionnaire appears to be more adequately suited for detecting learning gains in an inclusive setting. The results emphasize how important it is to carefully adopt and introduce the UDL principles for learning and to care about test accessibility when conducting quantitative research in inclusive settings. | |
License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Appears in Collections: | Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | ![]() |
Germany | 21 | 48.84% |
2 | ![]() |
United States | 8 | 18.60% |
3 | ![]() |
South Africa | 2 | 4.65% |
4 | ![]() |
No geo information available | 2 | 4.65% |
5 | ![]() |
Japan | 2 | 4.65% |
6 | ![]() |
Indonesia | 2 | 4.65% |
7 | ![]() |
Spain | 2 | 4.65% |
8 | ![]() |
Ukraine | 1 | 2.33% |
9 | ![]() |
Greece | 1 | 2.33% |
10 | ![]() |
Switzerland | 1 | 2.33% |
other countries | 1 | 2.33% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.