Leachu, S.; Janßen, J.; Gdanitz, N.; Kirchhöfer, M.; Janzen, S.; Stich, V.: Cascading Scenario Technique Enabling Automated And Situation-based Crisis Management. In: Herberger, D.; Hübner, M.; Stich, V. (Eds.): Proceedings of the Conference on Production Systems and Logistics: CPSL 2023 - 1. Hannover : publish-Ing., 2023, S. 321-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/13451
Zusammenfassung: | |
Crises are becoming more and more frequent. Whether natural disasters, economic crises, political events, or a pandemic - the right action mitigates the impact. The PAIRS project plans to minimize the surprise effect of these and to recommend appropriate actions based on data using artificial intelligence (AI).This paper conceptualizes a cascading model based on scenario technique, which acts as the basic approach in the project. The long-term discipline of scenario technique is integrated into the discipline of crisis management to enable short-term and continuous crises management in an automated manner. For this purpose, a practical crisis definition is given and interpreted as a process. Then, a cascading model is derived in which crises are continuously thought through using the scenario technique and three types of observations are classified: Incidents, disturbances, and crises. The presented model is exemplified within a non-technical application of a use case in the context of humanitarian logistics and the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, first technical insights from the field of AI are given in the form of a semantic description composing a knowledge graph. In summary, a conceptual model is presented to enable situation-based crisis management with automated scenario generation by combining the two disciplines of crisis management with scenario technique. | |
Lizenzbestimmungen: | CC BY 3.0 DE |
Publikationstyp: | BookPart |
Publikationsstatus: | publishedVersion |
Erstveröffentlichung: | 2023 |
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en): | Proceedings CPSL 2023 - 1 Proceedings CPSL 2023 - 1 |
Pos. | Land | Downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anzahl | Proz. | |||
1 | ![]() |
Germany | 25 | 49,02% |
2 | ![]() |
United States | 12 | 23,53% |
3 | ![]() |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7,84% |
4 | ![]() |
India | 3 | 5,88% |
5 | ![]() |
France | 2 | 3,92% |
6 | ![]() |
Indonesia | 1 | 1,96% |
7 | ![]() |
Hong Kong | 1 | 1,96% |
8 | ![]() |
Ecuador | 1 | 1,96% |
9 | ![]() |
Colombia | 1 | 1,96% |
10 | ![]() |
Canada | 1 | 1,96% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.