- Home
- →
- Fakultäten
- →
- Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
- →
- View Item
Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):
Bluhm, R.; Gassebner, M.; Langlotz, S.; Schaudt, P.: Fueling conflict? (De)escalation and bilateral aid. In: Journal of Applied Econometrics 36 (2021), Nr. 2, S. 244-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2797
Repository version
Selected time period:
Sum total of downloads: 42
| Abstract: | |
This paper studies the effects of bilateral foreign aid on conflict escalation and deescalation. First, we develop a new ordinal measure capturing the two-sided and multifaceted nature of conflict. Second, we propose a dynamic ordered probit estimator that allows for unobserved heterogeneity and corrects for endogeneity. Third, we identify the causal effect of foreign aid on conflict by predicting bilateral aid flows based on electoral outcomes of donor countries which are exogenous to recipients. Receiving bilateral aid raises the chances of escalating from small conflict to armed conflict, but we find little evidence that aid ignites conflict in truly peaceful countries. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Econometrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd | |
| License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
| Issue Date: | 2020 |
| Appears in Collections: | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät |
distribution of downloads over the selected time period:
downloads by country:
| pos. | country | downloads | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | perc. | |||
| 1 |  |
United States | 15 | 35.71% |
| 2 |  |
Germany | 12 | 28.57% |
| 3 |  |
China | 4 | 9.52% |
| 4 |  |
Latvia | 2 | 4.76% |
| 5 |  |
Taiwan | 1 | 2.38% |
| 6 |  |
Russian Federation | 1 | 2.38% |
| 7 |  |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2.38% |
| 8 |  |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2.38% |
| 9 |  |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2.38% |
| 10 |  |
France | 1 | 2.38% |
| other countries | 3 | 7.14% | ||
Further download figures and rankings:
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.