Kotzebue, L. von; Meier, M.; Finger, A.; Kremser, E.; Huwer, J. et al.: The framework dikolan (Digital competencies for teaching in science education) as basis for the self-assessment tool dikolan-grid. In: Education Sciences 11 (2021), Nr. 12, 775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120775
Abstract: | |
For the planning and implementation of lessons with digital technologies, a subject-specific technology-related professional competence of teachers is of central importance. However, the competency frameworks developed so far remain in a general perspective and do not explicitly address subject-specific issues. Furthermore, digital competencies are predominantly measured with subject-unspecific self-assessment instruments, as subject-specific operationalizations for this area are not yet available in a differentiated form. In this article, the framework for Digital Competencies for Teaching in Science Education (DiKoLAN), a subject-specific framework for pre-service science teachers, is introduced, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, first results of a self-assessment tool based on the framework are described. DiKoLAN defines competency areas highly specific to science, as well as more general competency areas that include aspects common to all subjects. Each competency area is described by competency expectations, which, in turn, are structured with reference to the four technology-related dimensions of the TPACK framework (i.e., Technological and Pedagogical Content Knowledge) and three levels of performance (Name, Describe, Use/Apply). Derived from DiKoLAN, a corresponding self-assessment instrument (DiKoLAN-Grid) was developed and empirically tested for the two competency areas, (n = 118) and Information Search and Evaluation (n = 90), in biology student teachers. By means of path models, tendencies regarding structural correlations of the four components Special Tools (TK), Content-specific Context (TCK), Methods and Digitality (TPK), and Teaching (TPACK) are presented for both competency areas and discussed, as well as in comparison to previously conducted, subject-unspecific surveys. © 2021, MDPI. All rights reserved. | |
License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophische Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | Germany | 45 | 50.56% | |
2 | United States | 14 | 15.73% | |
3 | China | 12 | 13.48% | |
4 | Russian Federation | 3 | 3.37% | |
5 | Japan | 2 | 2.25% | |
6 | Indonesia | 1 | 1.12% | |
7 | Greece | 1 | 1.12% | |
8 | United Kingdom | 1 | 1.12% | |
9 | France | 1 | 1.12% | |
10 | Austria | 1 | 1.12% | |
other countries | 8 | 8.99% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.