GIS and land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services in the North Karelia Biosphere Reserve, Finland

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Poikolainen, L.; Pinto, G.; Vihervaara, P.; Burkhard B.; Wolff, F. et al.: GIS and land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services in the North Karelia Biosphere Reserve, Finland. In: Fennia - International Journal of Geography 197 (2019), Nr. 2, S. 249–267. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11143/fennia.80331

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/11168

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 240




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, ecosystems and their services are key principles behind the establishment of “Biosphere Reserves”. Mapping of ecosystem services is one of the activities that is expected to increase the knowledge of sustainable land use planning. The Biosphere Reserves, established by the UNESCO Man and Biosphere Programme, aims to find the balance between nature conservation, use of natural resources, recreation and other culture-related activities. For this purpose, the ecosystem services approach is a promising tool for examining the relationships between people and nature in practice. This study applies the ecosystem services approach and examines which ecosystem services are perceived to be relevant in the North Karelia Biosphere Reserve in Eastern Finland. The results of a matrix method, with expert-based approach, showed that particularly old-growth forests and undrained open and forested mires have a broader potential to provide different ecosystem services. Water and urban areas are considered important for cultural services. However, these areas cover only a relatively small area altogether. The results of the ecosystem services assessment were compared to areas of high biodiversity, as defined by local biodiversity experts. The areas with high capacity for ecosystem services provision (from now on “high ecosystem services areas”) were found in areas with high biodiversity. In most cases, these areas are already under protection. The results also showed that ambiguity is an issue with the use of the ecosystem services concept in both stakeholder and expert evaluations.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2019-11
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 57 23.75%
2 image of flag of United States United States 44 18.33%
3 image of flag of Finland Finland 25 10.42%
4 image of flag of Korea, Republic of Korea, Republic of 9 3.75%
5 image of flag of India India 7 2.92%
6 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 6 2.50%
7 image of flag of China China 6 2.50%
8 image of flag of Canada Canada 6 2.50%
9 image of flag of Italy Italy 5 2.08%
10 image of flag of France France 5 2.08%
    other countries 70 29.17%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse