When Grades Are High but Self-Efficacy Is Low : Unpacking the Confidence Gap Between Girls and Boys in Mathematics

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Zander, L.; Höhne, E.; Harms, S.; Pfost, M.; Hornsey, M.J.: When Grades Are High but Self-Efficacy Is Low : Unpacking the Confidence Gap Between Girls and Boys in Mathematics. In: Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020), 552355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552355

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/10691

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 125




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Girls have much lower mathematics self-efficacy than boys, a likely contributor to the under-representation of women in STEM. To help explain this gender confidence gap, we examined predictors of mathematics self-efficacy in a sample of 1,007 9th graders aged 13–18 years (54.2% girls). Participants completed a standardized math test, after which they rated three indices of mastery: an affective component (state self-esteem), a meta-cognitive component (self-enhancement), and their prior math grade. Despite having similar grades, girls reported lower mathematics self-efficacy and state self-esteem, and were less likely than boys to self-enhance in terms of performance. Multilevel multiple-group regression analyses showed that the affective mastery component explained girls’ self-efficacy while cognitive self-enhancement explained boys’. Yet, a chi-square test showed that both constructs were equally relevant in the prediction of girls’ and boys’ self-efficacy. Measures of interpersonal sources of self-efficacy were not predictive of self-efficacy after taking the other dimensions into account. Results suggest that boys are advantaged in their development of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs, partly due to more positive feelings and more cognitive self-enhancement following test situations. © Copyright © 2020 Zander, Höhne, Harms, Pfost and Hornsey.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2020
Appears in Collections:Philosophische Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 62 49.60%
2 image of flag of United States United States 31 24.80%
3 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 5 4.00%
4 image of flag of China China 5 4.00%
5 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 3 2.40%
6 image of flag of Taiwan Taiwan 2 1.60%
7 image of flag of Sweden Sweden 2 1.60%
8 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 2 1.60%
9 image of flag of Morocco Morocco 2 1.60%
10 image of flag of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1.60%
    other countries 9 7.20%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse